Over the weekend I had a really interesting experience. I was attending a workshop in Manhattan
for Teaching Artists, and as we were all Theatre types, inevitably we were asked to participate in an
improvisation exercise.
I'd like to say that it was successful, but it simply didn't work. The relationships were weak, and so, ultimately, was the work.
This got me to thinking - how can total strangers hope to create art which is relevant or lasting if
they've only just met? Are there methods for taking an experiential approach that can actually result
in work which can exist outside of that particular moment in time?
In my Collaborative Projects class at NYU, we've done a couple of full-class improvisations, and the work we generated
was decidedly better - or maybe that's simply my perspective. In being able to see the work that we had created after-the-fact,
I'm sure that I found things in it that i hadn't in the moment.
Have any of you out there had similar experiences? Anyone have ideas as to how I can make my impromptu art-making
sessions feel more valuable?
HELP!